European Commission publishes first evaluation report under the GDPR

The report published by the European Commission covers international transfers and ‘cooperation and consistency mechanisms’.

07 July 2020

Publication

Background

The GDPR required that the EC produce a public report by 25 May 2020 (and every four years thereafter) evaluating and reviewing the GDPR, including a review of international transfers and cooperation and consistency mechanisms. The EC has released this initial report (the Report) which, in summary, sets out that the EC considers that the GDPR has met most of its objectives, in particular by offering citizens a strong set of enforceable rights and by creating a new European system of governance and enforcement.

Some key findings of the Report

  • Greater empowerment - the EC found that:

    • the GDPR empowers data subjects to control the use of their personal data
      with rights of rectification, erasure, access and objection; and

    • filing complaints with supervisory authorities and recovery of
      compensation for damage arising from breaches of the rights help
      enforce these rights.

    However, the EC flagged that more needs to be done to promote the
    right to data portability in the context of switching between service
    providers.

  • Balanced use of corrective powers - the EC considers that the general
    view is that data protection authorities have made balanced use of
    their strengthened corrective powers including warnings and fines.

  • One stop shop a work in progress – the EC’s findings were that
    Supervisory authorities are cooperating well in the context of the
    European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the one stop shop
    governance system. However, the EC comments that developing a truly
    harmonised data protection culture is an on-going process as data
    protection authorities have not yet “made full use of the tools the
    GDPR provides such as joint operations”
    . The EC noted that at times,
    finding a common approach meant moving to the lowest common
    denominator meaning opportunities to harmonise were missed.

  • Technology neutral means greater flexibility – the EC comments that
    as the GDPR is conceived in a technology neutral way, and is based on
    principles, it is designed to cover new technologies as they develop.
    The EC’s view is that this was demonstrated during the COVID-19
    crisis “notably in relation to the design of the tracing apps and
    other technological solutions to fight the pandemic
    ” without the need
    for modification of its provisions. The EC forecast challenges ahead
    in applying GDPR principles in fields such as artificial
    intelligence, blockchain, Internet of Things and facial recognition.

  • Modernising international data transfers - the EC is working with the
    EDPB to modernise mechanisms for international data transfers,
    including the Standard Contractual Clauses and developing specific
    guidance on the use of certification and codes of conduct for
    transferring data outside of the EU. The EC will report separately on
    the existing adequacy decisions, after the ECJ has delivered its
    judgment in the Schrems II case.

Future actions for the EC

Based on its findings in the Report, the EC sets out actions that it deems necessary to support GDPR and it will monitor these in view of its next evaluation report due in 2024. These actions include the EC:

  • encouraging cooperation between regulators;

  • finalising the work on the modernisation of the Standard Contractual
    Clauses, with a view to updating them in light of the GDPR, “covering
    all relevant transfer scenarios and better reflecting modern business
    practices
    ”; and

  • encouraging, including through financial support, the drafting of EU
    codes of conduct in the area of health and research.

Next Steps

Organisations should keep track of the EC’s action in this area, in particular in relation to the Standard Contractual Clauses. If the Standard Contractual Clauses are updated then many organisations may need to take further action to ensure that international data transfers are covered by an adequate mechanism of transfer.

Please let us know if you have any questions or would like to discuss the above.

This document (and any information accessed through links in this document) is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.